[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] A Microsoftesque detail in org
From: |
Rainer M Krug |
Subject: |
Re: [O] A Microsoftesque detail in org |
Date: |
Mon, 18 May 2015 13:29:45 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) |
Rasmus <address@hidden> writes:
> Rainer M Krug <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> OK - this makes sense. But instead of jumping to the next line, a
>> splitting of the header into two would make more sense, keeping the
>> correct syntax.
>
> That is literally what my patch does IF you are in region four (more
> or less) of org-complex-heading-regexp.
Sorry - I did not look into the patch - but that sounds perfect.
>
>> Jumping to the next line is actually counter intuitive, as this is
>> pure movement.
>
> It's what it does in tables (most of the time). What would be better?
For me, tables area a slightly different story, as they can not contain
line breaks. OK - you could argue headers neither. I think you got me
there. But the syntax in a table is more "abstract" then in a straight
header. Is you have priorities, tags, ... it is different, story.
But as you are asking, one more consistent possibility for tables would
be to *split* the cell where the cursor sits, (as in normal text) and
create a new empty row below the one the cursor is in with the cell
containing the remainder of the cell above. So:
| test 1 | re | t |
| test 2 | a | b |
| test 3 | c | d |
with cursor in the space in "test 2" would become
| test 1 | re | t |
| test 2 | a | b |
| 2 | | |
| test 3 | c | d |
But I would not suggest due to the table nature.
Cheers,
Rainer
>
> —Rasmus
--
Rainer M. Krug, PhD (Conservation Ecology, SUN), MSc (Conservation
Biology, UCT), Dipl. Phys. (Germany)
Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology Stellenbosch University South
Africa
Tel : +33 - (0)9 53 10 27 44 Cell: +33 - (0)6 85 62 59 98 Fax : +33 -
(0)9 58 10 27 44
Fax (D): +49 - (0)3 21 21 25 22 44
email: address@hidden
Skype: RMkrug
PGP: 0x0F52F982
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: [O] A Microsoftesque detail in org, Rasmus, 2015/05/20
Re: [O] A Microsoftesque detail in org, Titus von der Malsburg, 2015/05/15