Re: [O] Extra space between list items in HTML export

[Jambunathan K]

Richard Stanton <address@hidden> writes:

> On 9/10/12 4:31 PM, "Jambunathan K" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>>
>>>> From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden
>>>> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 2:37 PM
>>>>
>>>> > #+OPTIONS: h:2, toc:nil
>>>> >
>>>> > * Example of itemized list
>>>> > ** Blank level 2 header
>>>> > - List 1
>>>> > - List 2
>>>> > - List 3
>>>> >
>>>> > * Level 3 headings as itemized list, with extra space
>>>> > ** Blank level 2 header
>>>> > *** List 1
>>>> > *** List 2
>>>> > *** List 3
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> The old exporter does that: it breaks the second up into three lists,
>>>>each with
>>>> a single element. The first is a single list with three elements.
>>>>
>>>> The new exporter produces a single list with three elements, although
>>>>it
>>>> includes the section number for each entry - this might be a bug.
>>>>
>>>> Nick
>>>
>>> I also get the section number included as part of the list item
>>> text. This does look like a bug.
>>>
>>> When I use the new exporter to export to LaTeX/PDF, I get no section
>>> numbers, but I get a numbered, rather than itemized, list. This also
>>> seems like a (different) bug.
>>
>>I have pushed a fix to org-e-html.el.
>>
>>The depth of numbering is according to the value of num:N spec. Use
>>    num:2 instead of num:t
>>
>>to get the numbering behaviour you desire.
>>
>>If something is not according to taste, point me to the markup that is
>>missing or which needs to be removed (instead of describing it in
>>English)
>>
>>> Richard
>>>
>>>
>>
>>--
>
> Thanks. I'll try the new version.
>
> Meanwhile, as I understand it (and as implemented in the old exporter),
> h:2 should mean that only two levels of section headings should be created
> at all. Level 3 should be an itemized list (and therefore, implicitly,
> should not have a number). Thus, h:2 should imply n:2, I believe.

New exporter is, hmmm, new.

You can still get the old behaviour.  So, that leaves us with no scope
for complaining.  

I am merely following what Ngz has advised us.