|
From: | Carsten Dominik |
Subject: | Re: [Orgmode] Re: Poll: Who is using these commands |
Date: | Sun, 9 May 2010 17:24:16 +0200 |
On May 9, 2010, at 4:26 PM, Leo wrote:
On 2010-05-09 12:43 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:what do you think about C-M-f, C-M-b, C-M-n, C-M-p as alternative bindings? These seem to make *a lot* of sense, because, as many here have pointed out, they are so much better repeatable (Keep C-M- down, press the character.)It is terrible idea to override these parenthesis movement bindings. They are universal in all editing modes that if overridden people who also use other emacs packages will be surprised. For example to move from a open parenthesis to a closing parenthesis.
Isn't this a legitimate case for overwriting these? The outline structure is a hierarchical structure which can be traversed in a similar way as the parenthesis structure in Lisp code.... Emacs major mode conventions allow overwriting general commands when this makes sense for the mode and executed similiar functionality.
I am no exper here, so please tell me if this would be a reasonable interpretation or not.
- Carsten
However, it makes sense to bind C-M-a and C-M-e to move the the beginning/end of a subtree. I don't use these org movement bindings much because isearch does the job perfectly and it can be used everywhere. Leo -- CCL-USER> _ _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. address@hidden http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
- Carsten
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |