Re: a property "definition-type" would help find macro-defined tests

[Stephen Gildea]

Regarding where to document function find-function-update-type-alist and 
variable find-function-regexp-alist, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:

>   Why not in the same place where you describe this
>   property?  Just add the description of the alist value and
>   its elements.

We could.  I'd be happy to push this and call it done.

But it feels like it is in the wrong place.  Mostly, the
section "Standard Symbol Properties" is a compact list of all
the standard properties, and mostly it gives a short summary
for each and xrefs the section containing a thorough
discussion.  The part about definition-name and
find-function-type-alist is the only part that is more than
one paragraph long, and this would make it at least two
paragraphs longer.

I'd like to treat definition-name and find-function-type-alist
the same as the others:  discuss them thoroughly in their own
section, and reduce this section to a short paragraph with a
cross reference.

 < Stephen