Re: scratch/igc: Implications of MPS being asynchronous

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>
> Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com,  pipcet@protonmail.com,  emacs-devel@gnu.org,
>   gerd@gnu.org,  eller.helmut@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 15:05:08 +0100
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> Secondly I think offering garbage-collect gives the false impression
> >> that it has the same semantics in old and new GC. How would one make
> >> sure that existing calls to garbage-collect made for the old gC are
> >> the right thing for igc?
> >
> > Why could they not be?  I'm probably missing something.
> 
> I don't know all the places where garbage-collect is used, so I wouldn't
> be able to make sure all remain okay, that's what I was trying to say.

OK, understood.

We seem to call it in about a dozen places, so I guess we'd need to
review those to see whether it will make sens with MPS.