Re: scratch/igc: Implications of MPS being asynchronous

[Gerd Möllmann]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> Secondly I think offering garbage-collect gives the false impression
>> that it has the same semantics in old and new GC. How would one make
>> sure that existing calls to garbage-collect made for the old gC are
>> the right thing for igc?
>
> Why could they not be?  I'm probably missing something.

I don't know all the places where garbage-collect is used, so I wouldn't
be able to make sure all remain okay, that's what I was trying to say.