Re: scratch/igc: Keeping a TODO list?

[Gerd Möllmann]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 16:59:31 +0000
>> Cc: eller.helmut@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, gerd@gnu.org
>> 
>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> 
>> > I think we should have a TODO list of the necessary jobs that are
>> > prerequisites for landing the branch.  Developments that are not
>> > necessary for that are best kept separate, since they can wait until
>> > after we land the branch.
>> 
>> My current idea is to split the file into separate sections:
>> - *Blockers* are known to be blocking merging IGC to the master branch.
>> - *Not blockers* are known not to be blocking a merge.
>> - *Uncategorized* are not yet categorized into any the above.
>> - *Other ideas* are improvement ideas.
>
> My recommendation would be to leave only the first group.  The rest
> don't need to be managed, so having them is just extra work without
> any significant gain.  I think we should focus on the important stuff
> and on the goal.

I didn't know what Helmut + Pip were working on/considering to work on
and so on. I think that's interesting to have somewhere.