Re: scratch/igc: Keeping a TODO list?

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,  pipcet@protonmail.com,
>   stefankangas@gmail.com,  emacs-devel@gnu.org,  gerd@gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:37:19 +0100
> 
> Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > On Sun, Jan 12 2025, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >
> >>> From: Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@gmail.com>
> >>> Here are some of mine:
> >>
> >> Do you think any of these must be done before we land the branch?
> >
> > No.  I think that the people who decide what ends up in master don't
> > care much about these items.
> 
> Sometimes I think we should make another branch that is a real scratch
> branch again.

Does this mean you think the igc branch is not yet ready to consider
it for landing on master, and should remain a scratch experimental
branch for longer?

Otherwise, if we intend to land this at some not-too-distant future,
why is it wrong to consider what needs to be done before it can
happen?