Re: scratch/igc: Keeping a TODO list?

[Gerd Möllmann]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,  pipcet@protonmail.com,
>>   stefankangas@gmail.com,  emacs-devel@gnu.org,  gerd@gnu.org
>> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:37:19 +0100
>> 
>> Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@gmail.com> writes:
>> 
>> > On Sun, Jan 12 2025, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> >
>> >>> From: Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@gmail.com>
>> >>> Here are some of mine:
>> >>
>> >> Do you think any of these must be done before we land the branch?
>> >
>> > No.  I think that the people who decide what ends up in master don't
>> > care much about these items.
>> 
>> Sometimes I think we should make another branch that is a real scratch
>> branch again.
>
> Does this mean you think the igc branch is not yet ready to consider
> it for landing on master, and should remain a scratch experimental
> branch for longer?

It means I don't care much if scratch/igc gets merged, and that it
would be more interesting if some of the usual suspects could do more
interesting stuff on a different branch.

> Otherwise, if we intend to land this at some not-too-distant future,
> why is it wrong to consider what needs to be done before it can
> happen?

It's not wrong.