Re: Tree-sitter maturity

[tomas]

On Sat, Dec 28, 2024 at 11:21:10PM -0500, Daniel Colascione wrote:
> 
> 
> On December 28, 2024 11:19:04 PM EST, Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> wrote:
> >[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
> >[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
> >[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> >
> >  > For example, as explained in admin/notes/copyright:
> >
> >  >     lwlib/
> >  >     rms (2007/02/17): "lwlib is not assigned to the FSF; we don't
> >  >     consider it part of Emacs. [...] Therefore non-FSF copyrights are ok
> >  >     in lwlib."
> >
> >  > In my view, vendored tree-sitter grammars would be analogous to that.
> >
> >That is valid, as regards assignments.
> >
> >But there are practical eeasons why we MIGHT not want to include those
> >grammar files in Emacs at all.
> >
> 
> 
> Such as?

More difficult to get rid of?

Cheers
-- 
t

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature