Re: Tree-sitter maturity

[Daniel Colascione]

On December 28, 2024 11:19:04 PM EST, Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> wrote:
>[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
>[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
>[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
>  > For example, as explained in admin/notes/copyright:
>
>  >     lwlib/
>  >     rms (2007/02/17): "lwlib is not assigned to the FSF; we don't
>  >     consider it part of Emacs. [...] Therefore non-FSF copyrights are ok
>  >     in lwlib."
>
>  > In my view, vendored tree-sitter grammars would be analogous to that.
>
>That is valid, as regards assignments.
>
>But there are practical eeasons why we MIGHT not want to include those
>grammar files in Emacs at all.
>


Such as?