emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tree-sitter maturity


From: Richard Stallman
Subject: Re: Tree-sitter maturity
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2024 23:19:04 -0500

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

  > For example, as explained in admin/notes/copyright:

  >     lwlib/
  >     rms (2007/02/17): "lwlib is not assigned to the FSF; we don't
  >     consider it part of Emacs. [...] Therefore non-FSF copyrights are ok
  >     in lwlib."

  > In my view, vendored tree-sitter grammars would be analogous to that.

That is valid, as regards assignments.

But there are practical eeasons why we MIGHT not want to include those
grammar files in Emacs at all.

-- 
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]