Re: Progress on merging Eglot?

[Philip Kaludercic]

João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:

>> but this is a continuous process that would have to be synchronised on
>> both sides (emacs.git and GitHub) all the time.  That sounds like more
>> effort than the history is worth.
>>
>
> That's not the plan.  But if that _were_ the plan, then I can think of no
> better
> arguments than keeping history.  

In that case my apologies, I had misunderstood.

>                                  Good (Git) history is a benediction that
> should
> be preserved at (almost) all costs.
>
> João Távora