[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [External] : Re: Undo mode
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: [External] : Re: Undo mode |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Jan 2022 16:45:04 +0000 |
> See bug#51883. The conclusion was that undeleting frames is not a feature
> that all users need, and that enabling it by default uses some memory.
I haven't read that bug thread, but a
quick look at its status suggests that
there hasn't yet been _any_ conclusion.
Is this incorrect?
- RE: [External] : Re: Undo mode, (continued)
- Re: Undo mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/21
- Re: Undo mode, Stefan Kangas, 2022/01/21
- Re: Undo mode, Gregory Heytings, 2022/01/21
- RE: [External] : Re: Undo mode,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: Undo mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/21
- Re: Undo mode, Stefan Kangas, 2022/01/22
- Re: Undo mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/22
- Re: Undo mode, Stefan Kangas, 2022/01/22
- Re: Undo mode, Gregory Heytings, 2022/01/21