Re: "Can't find Hunspell dictionary" error (was Re: Emacs pretest 28.0.91 is out)

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
> Cc: Phil Sainty <psainty@orcon.net.nz>,  stefan@marxist.se,
>   emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 15:05:02 +0100
> 
> >>>>> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 14:39:23 +0200, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> said:
> 
>     >> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 00:28:58 +1300
>     >> From: Phil Sainty <psainty@orcon.net.nz>
>     >> Cc: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>, stefan@marxist.se, 
> emacs-devel@gnu.org
>     >> 
>     >> On 2022-01-13 23:39, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>     >> > There's a comment in ispell-find-hunspell-dictionaries that explains
>     >> > why we signal an error there.  If we replace this with logging a
>     >> > message, the problem the error attempts to solve will be back.
>     >> 
>     >> Using `with-demoted-errors' would achieve both goals, I think?
> 
>     Eli> Using that where? in the test suite?
> 
> Yes, for this one specific test. Although Iʼd prefer `ignore-errors',
> since that could later be wrapped in `skip-unless', unlike
> `with-demoted-errors'.

Fine with me.