[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Development Speed
From: |
Óscar Fuentes |
Subject: |
Re: Development Speed |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Dec 2021 11:38:43 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com> writes:
>> Have we checked lately if those machines that we purport to support are
>> able to run anything more complex than `emacs -Q'?
>
> Yes. For example, I tried quite a few things with the MS-DOS port, and
> thanks to that, it works on Emacs 28 now.
>
> The same situation exists with Windows 9x. At work, we have a 9x system
> for running legacy applications, and having Emacs 27 installed on that
> system is really convenient. And yes, that Emacs installation is
> regularly used.
How much RAM that machine has? Do you think it is justified to keep
Windows-9X support on Emacs for just a few anecdotal uses? If your
answer is that the extra work it adds is negligible and that you will
keep the maintenance burden, don't you think that keeping a separate
branch for Windows-9X (or any retro-computing platform, for that matter)
would be more adequate, instead of forcing everyone else to go over that
code when they read the sources?
Re: Development Speed, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/21
Re: Development Speed, Richard Stallman, 2021/12/21
- Re: Development Speed, Óscar Fuentes, 2021/12/22
- Re: Development Speed, Po Lu, 2021/12/22
- Re: Development Speed,
Óscar Fuentes <=
- Re: Development Speed, Po Lu, 2021/12/22
- Re: Development Speed, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/22
- Re: Development Speed, Richard Stallman, 2021/12/22
- Re: Development Speed, Óscar Fuentes, 2021/12/23
- Re: Development Speed, Po Lu, 2021/12/23
- Re: Development Speed, Óscar Fuentes, 2021/12/23
- Re: Development Speed, Arthur Miller, 2021/12/23
- Re: Development Speed, Richard Stallman, 2021/12/23
Re: Development Speed, Richard Stallman, 2021/12/23
Re: Development Speed, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/12/22