Re: Migrating to sourcehut - what's missing?

[Theodor Thornhill]

Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:

> Theodor Thornhill <theo@thornhill.no> writes:
>
>>>
>>> So that would be something like git.sr.ht/~eliz/emacs or
>>> git.sr.ht/~lars/emacs?  This makes me wonder how "hard coded" the user
>>> names are in the sourcehut code base.  Assuming the GNU project would
>>> host its sourcehut instance on the domain git.gnu.org, srht.gnu.org,
>>> source.gnu.org, or whatever, would it still be possible to remove the
>>> "~..." username part? (I know this is as minor of an issue as it gets,
>>> it's just curiosity).
>>>
>>> Until then, it seems that the username "~gnu" is not taken.  Maybe
>>> someone more entitled than me could mirror a few repositories over there
>>> for testing purposes?
>>>
>>
>> See my other mail just sent.  ~emacs is owned by me as for now, unless
>> ~gnu is preferred :)
>
> My understanding is that this would be a practical demonstration right?
> (I believe the consensus last time was that the service should be hosted
> on FSF servers.) If that is the case, I think that if you could set up a
> few example repositories (emacs, elpa, nongnu) on git., import a few
> mailing list archives on lists. and make up some issues on todo. then
> the discussion could become more concrete and the path forward more
> clear.
>

I'll set this up asap, and see where we will go from this.

And yes, this will be for demotstration purposes for the time being.

> -- 
>       Philip Kaludercic