Re: Migrating to sourcehut - what's missing?

[Philip Kaludercic]

Theodor Thornhill <theo@thornhill.no> writes:

>>
>> So that would be something like git.sr.ht/~eliz/emacs or
>> git.sr.ht/~lars/emacs?  This makes me wonder how "hard coded" the user
>> names are in the sourcehut code base.  Assuming the GNU project would
>> host its sourcehut instance on the domain git.gnu.org, srht.gnu.org,
>> source.gnu.org, or whatever, would it still be possible to remove the
>> "~..." username part? (I know this is as minor of an issue as it gets,
>> it's just curiosity).
>>
>> Until then, it seems that the username "~gnu" is not taken.  Maybe
>> someone more entitled than me could mirror a few repositories over there
>> for testing purposes?
>>
>
> See my other mail just sent.  ~emacs is owned by me as for now, unless
> ~gnu is preferred :)

My understanding is that this would be a practical demonstration right?
(I believe the consensus last time was that the service should be hosted
on FSF servers.) If that is the case, I think that if you could set up a
few example repositories (emacs, elpa, nongnu) on git., import a few
mailing list archives on lists. and make up some issues on todo. then
the discussion could become more concrete and the path forward more
clear.

-- 
        Philip Kaludercic