[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PL support
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: PL support |
Date: |
Sat, 09 May 2020 22:23:22 +0300 |
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>,
> emacs-devel <address@hidden>
> From: Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 9 May 2020 22:12:06 +0300
>
> On 09.05.2020 21:47, João Távora wrote:
>
> >> That doesn't sound too bad. Bonus points if the same hooks could be
> >> universal for the LSP protocol, i.e. if lsp-mode could conceivably use
> >> them too.
> >
> > The thing is, you haven't exactly explained why Eglot in core sounds
> > bad, either. You say Eglot in GNU Elpa is decent already and I agree.
>
> Imagine taking the whole of MELPA and putting it inside the Emacs
> repository.
Adding a couple of packages doesn't mean we want or need to add all of
them. This is the case where redictio ad absurdum is NOT a good
argument.
- Re: PL support, (continued)
- Re: PL support, Richard Stallman, 2020/05/12
- Re: PL support, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/05/13
- Re: PL support, Stefan Kangas, 2020/05/11
- Re: PL support, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/11
- Re: PL support, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/05/09
- Re: PL support, João Távora, 2020/05/09
- Re: PL support, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/05/09
- Re: PL support,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: PL support, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/05/09
- Re: PL support, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/09
- Re: PL support, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/05/09
- Re: PL support, João Távora, 2020/05/09
- Re: PL support, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/05/09
- Re: PL support, João Távora, 2020/05/09
- Re: PL support, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/05/09
- Re: PL support, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/09
- Re: PL support, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/05/09
- Re: PL support, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/10