[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why mouse-1/2/3 ?
From: |
Ulrich Mueller |
Subject: |
Re: Why mouse-1/2/3 ? |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Apr 2020 14:32:00 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> On Mon, 27 Apr 2020, wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 10:37:24AM +0000, ndame wrote:
>> > What is the "established terminology"?
>>
>> Left button, middle button, right button. I know no mainstream tool
>> which calls the left button mouse-1, etc
> Then your world is too small :-)
If Emacs will ever be localized for a language with an absolute
reference frame [1], then it would be "east button" for mouse-1 and
"west button" for mouse-3, when the user is a right-hander looking
south. :-)
> X has always called those buttons 1, 2, 3. And for good reasons,
> as this thread has shown...
SCNR,
Ulrich
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_and_spatial_cognition
- Re: Why mouse-1/2/3 ?, (continued)
Re: Why mouse-1/2/3 ?, Michael Welsh Duggan, 2020/04/27
Re: Why mouse-1/2/3 ?, ndame, 2020/04/27
Re: Why mouse-1/2/3 ?, Andreas Schwab, 2020/04/27
Re: Why mouse-1/2/3 ?, ndame, 2020/04/27
Re: Why mouse-1/2/3 ?, Po Lu, 2020/04/27
Re: Why mouse-1/2/3 ?, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/04/27