Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs)

[Robert Pluim]

>>>>> On Fri, 03 Apr 2020 14:00:06 +0300, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> said:

    >> From: Robert Pluim <address@hidden>
    >> Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 10:11:07 +0200
    >> Cc: emacs-devel <address@hidden>
    >> 
    Stephen> I don't understand what the alternative is. The parser imposes the
    Stephen> reasonable requirement that the input text be utf-8 (or possibly 
some
    Stephen> other standard format). Emacs raw buffer text is not utf-8, so we 
must
    Stephen> do some encoding.
    >> 
    >> Itʼs pretty close, apart from raw bytes.

    Eli> Not only raw bytes: also some characters that cannot be unified with
    Eli> Unicode.

And again: how likely are those characters to be in source code?

Robert