Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs)

[Stephen Leake]

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

>> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
>> Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 22:46:18 -0400
>> Cc: emacs-devel <address@hidden>
>> 
>> If the GC is the worry, we can use a function which encodes the
>> buffer using a given coding-system and returns a malloc'd array of bytes.
>
> I think we should try to avoid both copying and encoding the text we
> send to the parser.  Both operations are expensive and require memory
> allocation.

I don't understand what the alternative is. The parser imposes the
reasonable requirement that the input text be utf-8 (or possibly some
other standard format). Emacs raw buffer text is not utf-8, so we must
do some encoding.

If we try to pass a plain pointer to a point in the Emacs internal
buffer, there is no way to do that encoding.

It would be possible to change the lexer in the parser to accept Emacs
raw buffer format, but I don't think you are proposing that.

-- 
-- Stephe