RE: Add function to make frame topmost?

[Drew Adams]

> > Would enhancement request (bug) #4476 (#3464) be relevant here?
> 
> That's about actual fine-grained stacking order/z-order. 
> That's trickier. The stacking-layer patch I sent is _not_ that...

I see; thanks for explaining.

Not to divert the discussion from your patch, but wouldn't we anyway need
something like what bug #4476 suggests in order to save & restore frame configs?
If we are intending to be let users persistently save the state of their windows
and frames, then won't we need to record and restore (or at least request
restoration of) the fine-grained stacking order/z-order?

[Again, we don't need to discuss doing that in this thread. I just want to
better understand stacking order as it relates to recording and restoring frame
parameters and frame configs, since there is currently a (separate) discussion
about that.]