[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Differences between mail-mode and message-mode
From: |
Reiner Steib |
Subject: |
Re: Differences between mail-mode and message-mode |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:46:46 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
On Wed, Jul 22 2009, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Reiner Steib writes:
>
> > Obviously the key bindings cannot be resolved without a change for
> > either mail-mode or message-mode users. Maybe set the bindings
> > depending on some compatibility variable?
>
> How about the presence of Newsgroups?
> > > . In mail-mode C-c C-f C-f moves to FCC; in message-mode C-c C-f C-f
> > > moves to Followup-To, and C-c C-f C-w moves to FCC.
>
> Followup-To is rarely useful in a mail message.
A message-mode buffer can be news, mail or both. E.g. when adding Cc
to a news posting, the buffer also becomes a mail buffer (see
`message-news-p' and `message-mail-p'). I think modifying key
bindings depending on `message-news-p'/`message-mail-p' would be
confusing.
> > > . In mail-mode C-c C-f C-a moves to Mail-Reply-To; in message-mode
> There is no Mail-Reply-To header in the mail standards AFAIK.
> > > . In mail-mode C-c C-f C-l moves to Mail-Followup-To; in message-mode
> > > C-c C-f C-m moves to Mail-Followup-To and C-c C-f C-l is undefined
> There is no Mail-Followup-To header in the mail standards AFAIK,
> although there is a plausible argument that it is useful for mailing
> lists.
AFAIK, both aren't in any RFC. But at least Mail-Followup-To is quite
useful (and also supported by other MUA like mutt).
Bye, Reiner.
--
,,,
(o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/
- Re: message-mode is now default?, (continued)
- Re: message-mode is now default?, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/17
- Re: message-mode is now default?, Miles Bader, 2009/07/17
- Re: message-mode is now default?, Bastien, 2009/07/18
- Re: message-mode is now default?, Byung-Hee HWANG, 2009/07/18
- Re: message-mode is now default?, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/07/18
- Differences between mail-mode and message-mode (was: message-mode is now default?), Reiner Steib, 2009/07/19
- Re: Differences between mail-mode and message-mode, Sven Joachim, 2009/07/19
- Re: Differences between mail-mode and message-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/07/19
- Re: Differences between mail-mode and message-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/07/19
- Differences between mail-mode and message-mode (was: message-mode is now default?), Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/07/22
- Re: Differences between mail-mode and message-mode,
Reiner Steib <=
- Re: Differences between mail-mode and message-mode, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/07/22
- Re: Differences between mail-mode and message-mode, Miles Bader, 2009/07/23
- Re: message-mode is now default?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/07/18
- Re: message-mode is now default?, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/07/18
- Re: message-mode is now default?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/07/18
- Re: message-mode is now default?, David Kastrup, 2009/07/18
- Re: message-mode is now default?, Lennart Borgman, 2009/07/18
- Re: message-mode is now default?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/07/18
- Re: message-mode is now default?, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/07/18
- Re: message-mode is now default?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/07/18