[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: message-mode is now default?
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: message-mode is now default? |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Jul 2009 12:24:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> As long as message-mode is more in line with what a newcomer would
> expect, I don't see why we should strive to retain the previous
> behavior.
People are not trying to retain the previous behavior.
People are taking care of making the switch to message-mode a smooth
process. RMS expressed concerns about the code in message-mode. AMS
expressed concerns about the fact that the switch was not explicitely
(or not clearly) announced. These two concerns are just discarded by
the maintainers with the argument: "Making it the default is the best
way to make people work on message-mode".
I don't think forcing stuff is the right way to deal with defaults.
Same for `line-move-visual'. Requests for a poll have been silently
dismissed. Of course everyone can put (setq line-move-visual nil) in
her ~/.emacs, but if "customizing" and "debugging" are now synonyms,
Emacs should rather not be advertized as something that everyone wants
(or need?) to customize.
--
Bastien
- Re: message-mode is now default?, (continued)
- Re: message-mode is now default?, Miles Bader, 2009/07/19
- Re: message-mode is now default?, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/19
- Re: message-mode is now default?, Chong Yidong, 2009/07/20
- Re: message-mode is now default?, Reiner Steib, 2009/07/20
- Re: message-mode is now default?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/07/19
- Re: message-mode is now default?, David Kastrup, 2009/07/19
- Re: message-mode is now default?,
Bastien <=
- Re: message-mode is now default?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/07/19
- Differences between mail-mode and message-mode - sending mail (was: message-mode is now default?), Reiner Steib, 2009/07/19