[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CVS commits and logs
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: CVS commits and logs |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Nov 2006 04:38:18 +0900 |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> I dislike multi-file CVS commits specifically because of the clutter
> of having the entire change log entry in the log of each file.
>
> And what about multiple _authors_? Most of my commits are from
> automatic merging, which more often than not involves multiple authors.
>
> Is this all a matter of Gnus? We could handle Gnus specially.
Primarily Gnus, yes.
I basically wanted to point out that the guidelines being discussed,
while they definitely make prettier commit logs (I prefer that general
style too), are problematic for some uses. [The fact that they make
simultaneous commit impossible is also a problem generally of course.]
-miles
--
Somebody has to do something, and it's just incredibly pathetic that it
has to be us. -- Jerry Garcia
- Re: CVS commits and logs, (continued)
Re: CVS commits and logs, Jason Rumney, 2006/11/04
Re: CVS commits and logs, Richard Stallman, 2006/11/05
Re: CVS commits and logs, Bill Wohler, 2006/11/05
- Re: CVS commits and logs, Miles Bader, 2006/11/05
- Re: CVS commits and logs, Richard Stallman, 2006/11/06
- Re: CVS commits and logs,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: CVS commits and logs, Richard Stallman, 2006/11/07
- Re: CVS commits and logs, Miles Bader, 2006/11/07
- Re: CVS commits and logs, Richard Stallman, 2006/11/08
- Re: CVS commits and logs, Miles Bader, 2006/11/08
- Re: CVS commits and logs, Bill Wohler, 2006/11/09
- Re: CVS commits and logs, Richard Stallman, 2006/11/10
- Re: CVS commits and logs, Miles Bader, 2006/11/10
- Re: CVS commits and logs, Andreas Schwab, 2006/11/11
- Re: CVS commits and logs, Miles Bader, 2006/11/11
- Switching to Subversion (was: CVS commits and logs), Bill Wohler, 2006/11/11