[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Default face problem
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: Default face problem |
Date: |
Mon, 08 May 2006 14:51:30 +0900 |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
> But why does it think it is ok to use such a font as the
> frame's default font?
I don't know why. Perhaps, Gerd just overlooked such a
possibility.
> The problem we see is because the :align-to specs in the header line
> are formatted based on the width of the frame's default font, but if
> the default font is not used in the frame text, the result is very
> confusing.
I see.
> Wouldn't it make sense to fix the frame's default font at this
> step (eg. in realize_basic_faces) when it is detected that
> the specified default font is "not available".
I agree.
> IIRC, setting the frame default font is a little
> more trick than a mere assignment, so I should have written:
>
> if (frame->default_face->font != frame->default_font)
> set_frame_default_font(frame, frame->default_face->font;
Where is set_frame_default_font?
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- Re: Default face problem, Kim F. Storm, 2006/05/01
- Re: Default face problem, Stefan Monnier, 2006/05/01
- Re: Default face problem,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: Default face problem, Kim F. Storm, 2006/05/08
- Re: Default face problem, Kenichi Handa, 2006/05/08
- Re: Default face problem, Kim F. Storm, 2006/05/08
- Re: Default face problem, Kenichi Handa, 2006/05/10
- Re: Default face problem, Kim F. Storm, 2006/05/10
- Re: Default face problem, Kenichi Handa, 2006/05/10
- Re: Default face problem, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/10
- Re: Default face problem, Kenichi Handa, 2006/05/10
- Re: Default face problem, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/10
- Re: Default face problem, Kenichi Handa, 2006/05/11