[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Default face problem
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: Default face problem |
Date: |
Wed, 10 May 2006 21:41:26 +0900 |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
> Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:
>> But, I really don't know if it's ok to call
>> recompute_basic_faces recursively. Could you also test and
>> verify it?
> It works for me too.
> Looking at the code, it seems to be safe.
Thank you for checking it. I've just installed the patch.
Perhaps, "#ifdef HAVE_X_WINDOWS ... #endif" is not
necessary, but I can't test it on the other platform, and it
seems that this problem happens only on X.
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- Re: Default face problem, (continued)
- Re: Default face problem, Kim F. Storm, 2006/05/01
- Re: Default face problem, Stefan Monnier, 2006/05/01
- Re: Default face problem, Kenichi Handa, 2006/05/08
- Re: Default face problem, Kim F. Storm, 2006/05/08
- Re: Default face problem, Kenichi Handa, 2006/05/08
- Re: Default face problem, Kim F. Storm, 2006/05/08
- Re: Default face problem, Kenichi Handa, 2006/05/10
- Re: Default face problem, Kim F. Storm, 2006/05/10
- Re: Default face problem,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: Default face problem, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/10
- Re: Default face problem, Kenichi Handa, 2006/05/10
- Re: Default face problem, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/10
- Re: Default face problem, Kenichi Handa, 2006/05/11
- Re: Default face problem, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/13
- Re: Default face problem, Kenichi Handa, 2006/05/14
- Re: Default face problem, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/14
- Re: Default face problem, Kenichi Handa, 2006/05/15
- Re: Default face problem, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/10