Re: [Duplicity-talk] Question on dealing with Archives

[Aaron]

Hello Jeffrey,

On 07/06/17 18:16, Jeffrey wrote:

Thanks Aaron, 

I'm sure you are right, I'm trying to bend Duplicity to my needs.  

Aren't we all!

"Alternatively, if you are just wanting a full backup that you can easily extract, is there a reason not to just do a compressed archive (e.g. a tar.gz)?" 

-is there a way to set Duplicity to create and upload to S3 a simple compressed archive like a tar.gz?   My apologies if I'm missing the obvious.  

My point was that if you are not using any of the incremental features or the ability to restore at various points in time etc, you do not need duplicity at all and could just create a tar.gz as normal and upload it. Tar can even handle --exclude statements etc.

There is not a way to make duplicity create tar.gz files -- all those extra files and diffs you do not want are how we can do the efficient incremental versions. Unless you are using duplicity for an additional reason that I am missing. Why do you think you need duplicity?

My goal is to keep things simple to deal with in the event of a problem. For example I often travel and it would love it if I could use any available device to log in to my S3 account and get usable files with what's available on the computer at hand. I'd need just a browser and FTP to be back up and running. Could be Windows, Mac, Chromebook or even a smartphone. 

As I say, if you only need one version and simplicity is key, I would just zip/tar.gz up the files and copy them onto Amazon or whatever.

Not trying to dissuade you from using duplicity, but something else may fit this use case better.

Kind regards,

Aaron