[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature
|
From: |
Rhys Weatherley |
|
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature |
|
Date: |
Fri, 27 Sep 2002 16:45:10 +1000 |
Gopal V wrote:
> Shows my inexperience :P ... but still the item->typeInfo is an
> ILEnginetype_MV
> which IMHO is a valid 'this' type ?.. Because the 'isValueThis' is correct.
> Which made me assume that ILEnginetype_MV is one of the cases needed ...
> Because for identical code for System.Int32 and System.Decimal, the second
> fails to verify for this sole reason.
Compiler bug, as I suspected. Fixed in the CVS version now.
The "this" parameter should always be either an object reference
or a managed pointer. But in this case, cscc wasn't properly
recognising "Decimal" as a managed type.
Cheers,
Rhys.
- [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature, Jonathan P Springer, 2002/09/25
- Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature, Rhys Weatherley, 2002/09/26
- Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature, Jonathan P Springer, 2002/09/26
- Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature, Jonathan P Springer, 2002/09/26
- Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature, Gopal V, 2002/09/26
- Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature, Rhys Weatherley, 2002/09/26
- Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature, Gopal V, 2002/09/26
- Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature, Rhys Weatherley, 2002/09/26
- Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature, Gopal V, 2002/09/26
- Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature,
Rhys Weatherley <=
- Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature, Rhys Weatherley, 2002/09/26