Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature

[Gopal V]

If memory serves me right, Rhys Weatherley wrote:
> > And I hope it's the right one as ... Heaven forbid, I wouldn't want
> > a managed pointer (ILEngineType_M) as a 'this' object... So it's
> > ILEngineType_MV ... which should have been a typo ;-)
> 
> Managed pointers are perfectly valid as "this" objects
> when calling methods on value types.  Changing this would
> be _very_ unwise.  There is probably something else going
> on here - perhaps a compiler bug.

Shows my inexperience :P ... but still the item->typeInfo is an ILEnginetype_MV
which IMHO is a valid 'this' type ?.. Because the 'isValueThis' is correct.
Which made me assume that ILEnginetype_MV is one of the cases needed ... 
Because for identical code for System.Int32 and System.Decimal, the second
fails to verify for this sole reason.

Gopal
-- 
The difference between insanity and genius is measured by success