Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature

[Rhys Weatherley]

Gopal V wrote:

> And I hope it's the right one as ... Heaven forbid, I wouldn't want
> a managed pointer (ILEngineType_M) as a 'this' object... So it's
> ILEngineType_MV ... which should have been a typo ;-)

Managed pointers are perfectly valid as "this" objects
when calling methods on value types.  Changing this would
be _very_ unwise.  There is probably something else going
on here - perhaps a compiler bug.

Cheers,

Rhys.