[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature
From: |
Rhys Weatherley |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Sep 2002 13:46:12 +1000 |
Gopal V wrote:
> Shows my inexperience :P ... but still the item->typeInfo is an
> ILEnginetype_MV
> which IMHO is a valid 'this' type ?.. Because the 'isValueThis' is correct.
> Which made me assume that ILEnginetype_MV is one of the cases needed ...
> Because for identical code for System.Int32 and System.Decimal, the second
> fails to verify for this sole reason.
You'll need to give me more than this. What is the precise
C# and IL code that is causing the verification failure?
Cheers,
Rhys.
- [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature, Jonathan P Springer, 2002/09/25
- Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature, Rhys Weatherley, 2002/09/26
- Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature, Jonathan P Springer, 2002/09/26
- Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature, Jonathan P Springer, 2002/09/26
- Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature, Gopal V, 2002/09/26
- Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature, Rhys Weatherley, 2002/09/26
- Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature, Gopal V, 2002/09/26
- Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature,
Rhys Weatherley <=
- Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature, Gopal V, 2002/09/26
- Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature, Rhys Weatherley, 2002/09/27
- Re: [DotGNU]Patch -- Extend ilverify to print full method signature, Rhys Weatherley, 2002/09/26