[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Cp-tools-discuss] cvs re-org and contributors/copyright assignment
From: |
Nic Ferrier |
Subject: |
Re: [Cp-tools-discuss] cvs re-org and contributors/copyright assignment |
Date: |
06 Apr 2002 13:15:15 +0100 |
Alex Lancaster <address@hidden> writes:
> Yep, I believe he's already submitted some patches, but not to the
> patch manager (which is my fault, as I hadn't enabled that at the time
> he submitted them) there are three at:
>
> http://savannah.gnu.org/support/?group_id=508
>
> My question is: do we need (C) assignment for these, or can I just go
> ahead and install them? What counts as "substantial", i.e. what's the
> threshold needed for (C) asssignment?
20 or 30 lines would be substantial. Whole new features would be
substantial.
>
> I think he'd like to be a developer with CVS write access, which is
> fine with me, but I want to make sure that all is well as far as the
> (C) issue is concerned, do all developers with CVS write access to GNU
> projects need to sign forms etc?
Yes.
> Please just go ahead and put it into the modulename/src as we
> discussed on the list, I can worry about the build issues for gjdoc
> and texinfo-doclet later...
Ok. I will.
> Fine, perhaps I can figure out what you're trying to do from the Perl
> script and then convert it into an automake format.
I'm not sure it's going to work with automake... I spent a little
time looking at it last night. I think want I'm doing is creating a
new class of automake target.
Nic