[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: address@hidden: Bug#109613: Size column in partition list]
From: |
Andrew Clausen |
Subject: |
Re: address@hidden: Bug#109613: Size column in partition list] |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Sep 2001 19:55:34 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 05:56:26AM -0300, Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> I think "Sistema de Arquivos" is the right choice. "Sistema"
> isn't enough, and "Sistema/Arqs" is ugly.
I'm curious why you think this... do you think "xato" (or even xatu!),
"vc" and "tô" are also ugly? (for everyone else: they are pt_IRC
abbreviations for "chato", "você", and "eu estou" respectively - feel
free to have a rant on this - I'm genuinely curious ;) Is "ugly"
important? Is it just that you're obsessed with perfect pt_BR, or do
you think most pt speakers would be personally offended, find it
confusing, unprofessional or whatever?
Basically, the reason we're having this holy war is some users want more
information, but we can't fit the information if some cultures object to
abbreviations.
pt_BR: full!
------
Minor Início Fim Tipo Sistema de arquivos Sinalizador
1 0.984 199.828 primary linux-swap
en: plenty of room!
---
Minor Start End Type Filesystem Flags
1 0.984 199.828 primary linux-swap
So we have a choice: good language vs good information.
What's more important?
I'd like to think information is more important...
t+
Andrew
- Re: address@hidden: Bug#109613: Size column in partition list], Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2001/09/11
- Re: address@hidden: Bug#109613: Size column in partition list],
Andrew Clausen <=
- Re: address@hidden: Bug#109613: Size column in partition list], Damien Genet, 2001/09/12
- Re: address@hidden: Bug#109613: Size column in partition list], Eliphas Levy Theodoro, 2001/09/12
- Re: address@hidden: Bug#109613: Size column in partition list], Andrew Clausen, 2001/09/12
- Re: address@hidden: Bug#109613: Size column in partition list], Eliphas Levy Theodoro, 2001/09/12
- Re: address@hidden: Bug#109613: Size column in partition list], Andrew Clausen, 2001/09/13