Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps

[Paul Smith]

On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 18:04 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > (I don't know why Windows doesn't, because NTFS does support
> > millisecond resolution timestamps I believe)
> 
> Because no one wrote the code, of course.

Ah, the oldest reason in free software :-).

> The main problem is that this requires to write a replacement 'stat'
> (not rocket science).

Can't we just #define stat(_p,_b) _stat(_p,_b)?  Not sure if that's
sufficient: I'm not overly familiar with the limitations on the POSIX
emulation functions in Windows.