[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Aug 2014 20:32:35 +0300 |
> Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 18:30:12 +0100
> From: Keith Marshall <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> > FAT filesystems are hardly important these days.
>
> Except insofar as they tend to be prevalent on removable media devices,
> such as USB flash drives; woe betide anyone who happens to store their
> working files on one of those.
Indeed, let alone builds software on such volumes.
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, (continued)
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, David Boyce, 2014/08/23
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, Paul Eggert, 2014/08/23
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, Paul Smith, 2014/08/26
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/08/26
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, Paul Smith, 2014/08/26
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/08/26
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, Keith Marshall, 2014/08/26
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, Paul Eggert, 2014/08/26
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/08/26
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, Keith Marshall, 2014/08/26
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, Bob Friesenhahn, 2014/08/21