[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Aug 2014 20:22:41 +0300 |
> Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 08:25:38 -0700
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> Cc: Autoconf <address@hidden>, Eric Blake <address@hidden>,
> bug-make <address@hidden>
>
> As far as Windows goes, NTFS file systems have 100 ns resolution, and
> FAT file systems are the joker as they have a 2-second resolution for
> last-modified time.
That's true, but FAT filesystems are hardly important these days.
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, (continued)
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, Paul Eggert, 2014/08/21
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, Paul Smith, 2014/08/23
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, David Boyce, 2014/08/23
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, Paul Eggert, 2014/08/23
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, Paul Smith, 2014/08/26
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/08/26
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, Paul Smith, 2014/08/26
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/08/26
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, Keith Marshall, 2014/08/26
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, Paul Eggert, 2014/08/26
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, Keith Marshall, 2014/08/26
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/08/26
Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, Bob Friesenhahn, 2014/08/21