[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps
From: |
David Boyce |
Subject: |
Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:03:54 -0700 |
The obvious compromise would be to change the behavior only in the
presence of the ".POSIX:" special target.
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
> Eric Blake wrote:
>>
>> You may want to check out http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=857 and
>> add comments and/or change GNU make behavior accordingly.
>
>
> Let's leave GNU 'make' alone. Its behavior is better for rules like this:
>
> copy: original
> cp -p original copy
>
> I've added a comment to the Austin Group page.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-make mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
- POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, Eric Blake, 2014/08/21
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, Ray Donnelly, 2014/08/21
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, Paul Eggert, 2014/08/21
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps,
David Boyce <=
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, Paul Eggert, 2014/08/21
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, Paul Smith, 2014/08/23
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, David Boyce, 2014/08/23
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, Paul Eggert, 2014/08/23
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, Paul Smith, 2014/08/26
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/08/26
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, Paul Smith, 2014/08/26
- Re: POSIX ruling on up-to-date vs. identical timestamps, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/08/26