[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation
From: |
Imran Ghory |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 21:25:29 -0000 |
On 23 Jan 2001, at 15:05, Tom Chance wrote:
> I think the answer to this classification debate lies
> in why we would classify articles anyway. So it is
> easier to find the article you want, to understand the
> breif meaning of an article you may not recognise the
> subject of, or two browse the resource better.
Neither, it should just indicate to the reader that the review body
thought the article was factually biased. How the reader chooses to
interpreted the classification is entirely up to them.
Imran Ghory
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, (continued)
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, Tom Chance, 2001/01/23
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, Tom Chance, 2001/01/24