[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Design proposal
From: |
Imran Ghory |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Design proposal |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Jan 2001 19:12:23 -0000 |
On 23 Jan 2001, at 9:46, Tom Chance wrote:
> Plus of course if we swapped systems, they'd have to
> be compatible or easily interchangeable. I've been
> talking to RMS who agrees that it would be best to
> keep it simple with HTML (not XML or other text
> display technologies), not only because it will work
> with any browser (even lynx!) but also because it will
> be easy to change into other formats should we wish
> to.
XML to HTML could be provided, also converting from XML into
other formats would probably be easier then converting from HTML.
XML would also allows us to give a more "uniform" style overall.
Imran
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Design proposal, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Design proposal, Tom Chance, 2001/01/23
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Design proposal, Bob Dodd, 2001/01/23
- RE: [Bug-gnupedia] Design proposal, Bob Dodd, 2001/01/23
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Design proposal, Rob Scott, 2001/01/23
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Design proposal, Rob Scott, 2001/01/23
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Design proposal, Tom Chance, 2001/01/23
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Design proposal, James Dennett, 2001/01/24
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Design proposal, Tom Chance, 2001/01/23
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Design proposal, Tom Chance, 2001/01/23