[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Design proposal
From: |
Hook |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Design proposal |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 17:13:25 +0800 |
Mike Warren wrote:
> Tom Chance <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Plus of course if we swapped systems, they'd have to be compatible
> > or easily interchangeable. I've been talking to RMS who agrees that
> > it would be best to keep it simple with HTML (not XML or other text
> > display technologies), not only because it will work with any
> > browser (even lynx!) but also because it will be easy to change into
> > other formats should we wish to.
>
> How do you encode ``author'' (etcetera) in HTML?
You don't of course, and you're quite right. HTML is presentation, XML is
content, and the two shouldn't be expected to mix.
Paul
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Design proposal, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Design proposal, Bob Dodd, 2001/01/23
- RE: [Bug-gnupedia] Design proposal, Bob Dodd, 2001/01/23
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Design proposal, Rob Scott, 2001/01/23
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Design proposal, Rob Scott, 2001/01/23
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Design proposal, Tom Chance, 2001/01/23
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Design proposal, James Dennett, 2001/01/24
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Design proposal, Tom Chance, 2001/01/23
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Design proposal, Tom Chance, 2001/01/23
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Design proposal, Tom Chance, 2001/01/23