Re: [Bayonne-devel] Re: Brooktrout

[David Sugar]

Actually, since the Brooktrout sdk uses streams, and I think, models 
events somewhat like the dialogic, I would expect the dialogic driver as 
being the best model to work from.  If the sdk does have a full 
asynchrononus programming model, then perhaps the vpb driver would be a 
good model to use instead.  

In any case, having a sdk to examine is the nessisary starting point.  I 
have one of their cards here; it's a full length PCI card with 4 RJ-14 
jacks on the back, and a small 3 pin jack also on the back, but I have 
forgotten which card it is...

On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Jim Ley wrote:

> 
> "David Sugar" <address@hidden> wrote in message
> news:address@hidden
> >
> > I actually have a brooktrout card here for testing, but I had been
> unable
> > to get their latest beta sdk to test it with, although I have a much
> older
> > beta to try it with.  If we could get a current sdk, and it seems
> likely
> > they will actually release a linux sdk, then I think we could get a
> driver
> > running very quickly.
> 
> I don't quite understand why the latest SDK isn't available for
> download - it is at least mentioned in the FAQ's.  As an owner of a few
> units, I can probably hurry on their support guys to get a copy of the
> linux SDK, I've also got applications running currently on WinNT, should
> I look to develop a driver myself? - I'm not sure I've got the
> experience, but I'd give it a go.
> 
> I assume a driver is basically taking the  "dummy" driver and
> implementing all the stubs to actually do something?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Jim.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bayonne-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bayonne-devel
>