[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] Patches for 1.7.1?
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] Patches for 1.7.1? |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Mar 2011 06:50:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
As Boyapati, Anitha wrote:
> The build errors can be safely ignored. This is because of empty io
> header files used for xmega32X1 and Xmega128B1. gcrt1.S requires
> some definitions like __VECTORS_SIZE to be initialized in header
> files. Since it does not find them, gcrt1.S could not expand
> 'vectors' macro for those devices.
But what's the point of adding support for devices that is not
complete, and causes build errors?
Given that we specifically released avr-libc 1.7.1 in preparation of
the AVR Studio 5 release, I'm a little surprised the AVR Studio 5
toolchain needs to apply private patches to avr-libc in their
distribution at all. IMHO, everything that is ready for the users
could have been in the tree before, and everything that isn't, why
is it released anyway?
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
- [avr-libc-dev] Patches for 1.7.1?, Ruud Vlaming, 2011/03/21
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Patches for 1.7.1?, Weddington, Eric, 2011/03/21
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Patches for 1.7.1?, Ruud Vlaming, 2011/03/21
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Patches for 1.7.1?, Weddington, Eric, 2011/03/22
- Message not available
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Patches for 1.7.1?, Ruud Vlaming, 2011/03/24
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Patches for 1.7.1?, Weddington, Eric, 2011/03/24
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Patches for 1.7.1?, Ruud Vlaming, 2011/03/22
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Patches for 1.7.1?, Boyapati, Anitha, 2011/03/23
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Patches for 1.7.1?, Ruud Vlaming, 2011/03/23
RE: [avr-libc-dev] Patches for 1.7.1?, Boyapati, Anitha, 2011/03/21