[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] Patches for 1.7.1?
From: |
Ruud Vlaming |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] Patches for 1.7.1? |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 22:56:32 +0000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.10 |
On Monday 21 March 2011, you wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: address@hidden
> > [mailto:address@hidden On
> > Behalf Of Ruud Vlaming
> > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 6:37 AM
> > To: address@hidden
> > Subject: [avr-libc-dev] Patches for 1.7.1?
> >
> > On Atmels website:
> >
> > http://distribute.atmel.no/tools/opensource/as5-beta/avr8-gnu-toolchain-
> > 3.2.0.255-source.zip
> >
> > there are patches for libc 1.7.1
> >
> <snip>
> >
> > But version 1.7.1 is very new and does it need patching?
> >
> > Furthermore, the first two patches (40, 41) can be applied,
> > but compilation results in an error:
> <snip>
> >
> > I am curious at your opinion.
>
> Hi Ruud,
>
> First off, does binutils and gcc patch cleanly and build correctly?
Yes, with versions:
binutils: 20.1
gcc: 4.4.3
mpfr: 3.0.0
gmp: 5.0.1
All patches accepted with (small) offsets for most hunks.
I solved the 52-avr-libc-1.7.1-atmega32_5_50_90_pa.patch problem,
this was due to a patch mismatch in binuitls om my behalf. (Good tip Eric!
It forced me to really check this)
However, the problems with
40-avr-libc-1.7.1-xmega32X1.patch
41-avr-libc-1.7.1-xmega128b1.patch
remain. It could be related to
http://www.avrfreaks.net/index.php?name=PNphpBB2&file=viewtopic&p=731525
but i do not have the 'unknown MCU' in my output, so it is
probably something else.
Ruud
RE: [avr-libc-dev] Patches for 1.7.1?, Boyapati, Anitha, 2011/03/21