avr-libc-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [avr-libc-dev] Patches for 1.7.1?


From: Ruud Vlaming
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Patches for 1.7.1?
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 22:56:32 +0000
User-agent: KMail/1.9.10

On Monday 21 March 2011, you wrote:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: address@hidden
> > [mailto:address@hidden On
> > Behalf Of Ruud Vlaming
> > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 6:37 AM
> > To: address@hidden
> > Subject: [avr-libc-dev] Patches for 1.7.1?
> > 
> > On Atmels website:
> > 
> >   http://distribute.atmel.no/tools/opensource/as5-beta/avr8-gnu-toolchain-
> > 3.2.0.255-source.zip
> > 
> > there are patches for libc 1.7.1
> > 
> <snip>
> > 
> > But version 1.7.1 is very new and does it need patching?
> > 
> > Furthermore, the first two patches (40, 41) can be applied,
> > but compilation results in an error:
> <snip>
> > 
> > I am curious at your opinion.
> 
> Hi Ruud,
> 
> First off, does binutils and gcc patch cleanly and build correctly?

Yes, with versions:
  binutils: 20.1
  gcc: 4.4.3
  mpfr: 3.0.0
  gmp: 5.0.1
All patches accepted with (small) offsets for most hunks.
I solved the 52-avr-libc-1.7.1-atmega32_5_50_90_pa.patch problem,
this was due to a patch mismatch in binuitls om my behalf. (Good tip Eric!
It forced me to really check this)

However, the problems with 
  40-avr-libc-1.7.1-xmega32X1.patch
  41-avr-libc-1.7.1-xmega128b1.patch
remain. It could be related to 
  http://www.avrfreaks.net/index.php?name=PNphpBB2&file=viewtopic&p=731525
but i do not have the 'unknown MCU' in my output, so it is
probably something else.

Ruud



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]