[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-libc-dev] Patches for 1.7.1?
From: |
Boyapati, Anitha |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-libc-dev] Patches for 1.7.1? |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:55:43 +0800 |
>>
>> Hi Ruud,
>>
>> First off, does binutils and gcc patch cleanly and build correctly?
>
>Yes, with versions:
> binutils: 20.1
> gcc: 4.4.3
> mpfr: 3.0.0
> gmp: 5.0.1
>All patches accepted with (small) offsets for most hunks.
Versions to be used are:
GCC - 4.5.1.
Binutils - 2.20.1
The patches are named after corresponding versions. AVR Toolchain 3.1.0 and
3.2.0 releases use same gcc and binutils versions.
>However, the problems with
> 40-avr-libc-1.7.1-xmega32X1.patch
> 41-avr-libc-1.7.1-xmega128b1.patch
>remain. It could be related to
> http://www.avrfreaks.net/index.php?name=PNphpBB2&file=viewtopic&p=731525
>but i do not have the 'unknown MCU' in my output, so it is
>probably something else.
The build errors can be safely ignored. This is because of empty io header
files used for xmega32X1 and Xmega128B1. gcrt1.S requires some definitions like
__VECTORS_SIZE to be initialized in header files. Since it does not find them,
gcrt1.S could not expand 'vectors' macro for those devices.
HTH
Anitha
- [avr-libc-dev] Patches for 1.7.1?, Ruud Vlaming, 2011/03/21
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Patches for 1.7.1?, Weddington, Eric, 2011/03/21
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Patches for 1.7.1?, Ruud Vlaming, 2011/03/21
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Patches for 1.7.1?, Weddington, Eric, 2011/03/22
- Message not available
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Patches for 1.7.1?, Ruud Vlaming, 2011/03/24
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Patches for 1.7.1?, Weddington, Eric, 2011/03/24
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Patches for 1.7.1?, Ruud Vlaming, 2011/03/22
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Patches for 1.7.1?, Boyapati, Anitha, 2011/03/23
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Patches for 1.7.1?, Ruud Vlaming, 2011/03/23
RE: [avr-libc-dev] Patches for 1.7.1?, Boyapati, Anitha, 2011/03/21