[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-libc-dev] Feature wishlisht
From: |
Boyapati, Anitha |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-libc-dev] Feature wishlisht |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:51:50 +0800 |
>
>The other point I would like to know is test strategy - how is avr-libc
>being tested currently? Do we use simulator for executing tests or some set
>of devices per family...
>
>
How blind can I be? I am taking this back! I just realized that tests folder
exists and that atmega128, at90s8515 (and 4 more- in short arch 2,4,5) are used
on simulavr.
Ever since delay cycles regression, I was thinking if there is a way to catch
such bugs much before.
Anitha
- [avr-libc-dev] Feature wishlisht, Boyapati, Anitha, 2011/02/25
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Feature wishlisht, Joerg Wunsch, 2011/02/25
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Feature wishlisht, Boyapati, Anitha, 2011/02/25
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Feature wishlisht, Weddington, Eric, 2011/02/25
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Feature wishlisht, Boyapati, Anitha, 2011/02/26
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Feature wishlisht,
Boyapati, Anitha <=
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Feature wishlisht, Weddington, Eric, 2011/02/27
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Feature wishlisht, Joerg Wunsch, 2011/02/28