RE: [avr-libc-dev] Feature wishlisht

[Weddington, Eric]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boyapati, Anitha
> Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2011 7:52 PM
> To: Boyapati, Anitha; Weddington, Eric; Joerg Wunsch; avr-libc-
> address@hidden
> Subject: RE: [avr-libc-dev] Feature wishlisht
> 
> 
> 
> >
> >The other point I would like to know is test strategy - how is avr-libc
> >being tested currently? Do we use simulator for executing tests or some
> set
> >of devices per family...
> >
> >
> 
> How blind can I be? I am taking this back! I just realized that tests
> folder exists and that atmega128, at90s8515 (and 4 more- in short arch
> 2,4,5) are used on simulavr.
> 
> Ever since delay cycles regression, I was thinking if there is a way to
> catch such bugs much before.

Well, certainly there is *some* testing, but as you can see it could certainly 
use improvement.

Ideally, it should be tested for all devices, but that's now well over 100 
devices.