Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf

[Russell Shaw]

Paul Schlie wrote:
> Yes basically correct, and as long as ./configure is kept up to date,
> no one other than the maintainers need be concerned with what versions
> autoxxx tools/scripts are chosen to used.
>
>>Now we're exactly back where we started. ;-)

reconf is similar to other bootstraps, except the version
checking is too strict on insisting *only* autoconf 2.13
and automake 1.4 are used. Users shouldn't need doconf,
which was the other half of the complaint.