autoconf-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 17-proto-autoscan-check.patch


From: Pavel Roskin
Subject: Re: 17-proto-autoscan-check.patch
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 12:36:21 -0500 (EST)

> Please, Pavel, make your patch relative to the *latest* patch I sent,
> and accept the previous ones.  There is no point in working two
> different branches.  Let's go forward, and let's stop this ridiculous
> loss of time on the way we walk.  The only thing that matters is
> *where* we go.
>
> I have made steps _forward_, please, step in my tracks.

Ok, I understand that you patch has been applied, at least partly:

2001-01-22  Akim Demaille  <address@hidden>

        * autoscan.pl: Instead of undefined globals, set them to empty
        values.
...

If you want to apply another patch send it to the list or apply it. In
fact, I think that our patches should not conflict.

I want to use "use strict" because it makes hacking the code safer (but
don't trust the compiler too much anyway).

Regards,
Pavel Roskin




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]